- Renowned actress Rita Edochie denies speculations of secretly disliking May Edochie, wife of her brother-in-law Yul Edochie.
- Rita emphasizes her unwavering support for May and questions the baseless notion of any ulterior motives, stating that she cannot gain anything from separating family members.
- The veteran actress reveals her primary concern is to see Yul and May reunite as a loving couple.
- Rita denies ever speaking ill of Yul online and asserts her commitment to family unity, making it clear that her actions are not driven by personal animosity.
Renowned Nollywood actress Rita Edochie has denied circulating rumours that suggest she secretly dislikes May Edochie, the wife of her brother-in-law Yul Edochie.
Setting the record straight, the veteran actress expressed her unwavering support for May and revealed the true motive behind her actions.
Addressing the speculations, Rita Edochie questioned the baseless notion that she harbours any animosity towards May.
She challenged the rumours, asking what she would stand to gain from allegedly wanting to remove May from the family.
Rita Edochie clarified that such speculations are unfounded, emphasizing that she cannot conceivably entertain thoughts of undermining her family’s unity.
Rita Edochie disclosed that her primary concern is to witness the restoration of the harmonious and loving relationship that Yul and May Edochie once shared as husband and wife.
The actress made it clear that her support for May is driven by a genuine desire to see the couple reunite and overcome any challenges they may be facing.
“ALL I AM FIGHTING FOR IS TO SEE THEM COME BACK TOGETHER AS THE PEACEFUL AND LOVING UNION THEY HAVE BEEN
AND IT MUST COME TO PASS IJMN
YUL IS A SON I LOVE SO MUCH AND I CAN NEVER SPEAK ILL OF HIM OR TROLL HIM ONLINE, HOW CAN I DISLIKE MY OWN HUSBAND’S BROTHER?
MY ONLY PROBLEM IS “YOU KNOW WHO” AND I WILL NOT KEEP QUIET UNTIL THE YOKE IS BROKEN..
AS FOR QUEEN MAY, HEAVEN KNOWS MY LOVE FOR HER CAN NEVER BE MEASURED SO I REST MY CASE FOR NOW…,” Rita Edochie said in part.
See below;
Discussion about this post