- Iyabo Ojo has issued a strong warning to Lizzy Anjorin while pleading that her husband treats her of any mental health issues she might have, so she won’t use it as an excuse in court.
- This comes after Lizzy Anjorin refused to show up after Iyabo Ojo dragged her to court over alleged defamation. Reacting to her absence, she asked her colleague to come with evidence.
- Ojo in response said she will not yet reveal the truth about Anjorin’s past because she knows numerous homes will be broken.
Actress Iyabo Ojo has said that homes will be broken if she reveals the truth about her rival, Lizzy Anjorin.
The 46-year-old who is currently in a legal battle with Lizzy Anjorin over alleged defamation said this in a recent Instagram live session in which she added that the internet would crash if she told Lizzy’s story.
Iyabo Ojo claimed to have detailed evidence to back her claims but she won’t go down the route yet. She requested that Lizzy Anjorin’s husband treat his wife of any mental health issues so it isn’t used as an excuse in court.
Iyabo Ojo said:
“If I come out and tell your story, internet will crash, there is no blogger in Nigeria that will not carry this story because I go dey mention with names. That’s why I can’t come out and say your story because I think of all the homes that will be broken.
“I will come out with facts and figures, date and time, name and place. I have a book where I wrote everything down, but you know what? I don’t need to go that route with you, not yet.
“That’s why I warned your husband that he should go and treat you because I don’t want when we go to court, you’ll now start claiming you have mental health,”
Recall that Iyabo through her lawyers on November 24, accused Lizzy of referring to her as Sepeteri, a fictional character that Lizzy claimed had a threesome with her daughter.
In the letter, Iyabo demanded an apology, a retraction and N500 million as compensation for damages to her reputation, adding that the matter would be taken to court if Lizzy failed to oblige to her demands.
Discussion about this post