- Pere highlighted the importance of a father’s presence in their child’s life while condemning mothers who use their kids as weapons against their father.
- He emphasized that any issues between the parents should stay with them and therefore should not affect the child’s access to their father.
Reality TV star Pere Egbi recently voiced his views on the significance of a father’s involvement in their child’s life amidst the ongoing custody battle between Davido and his babymama Sophia Momodu.
Pere stressed the importance of children having access to both their parents, regardless of any conflicts between them.
He emphasized that children are innocent and should not be manipulated or kept away from one parent due to disagreements between adults.
“No child should be denied knowing and spending time with and being a part of their father’s life. You ain’t cool with the dad; that’s not the child’s fault. Some women are just unbelievable,” he wrote.
Amidst Davido’s custody battle between him and his baby mama, Dele Momodu provides clarity on the whole issue.
In a sensational Instagram post on Saturday, July 6, Momodu spilled the tea, revealing his utter disbelief at Davido’s latest court antics. The Afrobeat icon had brazenly filed an affidavit, claiming he’s been cut off from his daughter, Imade – a move that left Momodu slack-jawed with shock.
Momodu revealed that despite Davido’s claims, the singer and his family have had unrestricted access to Imade. When Davido decided to stop paying for Imade’s school fees, Momodu said he alerted Davido’s father, Deji Adeleke, who not only settled all the school fees but also gifted the child a car.
The politician went on to disclose that the real bone of contention was Sophia and Imade’s accommodation payments.
According to him, Sophia proposed that Davido should cover the full amount while she paid half the rent. However, Davido shot down this proposal, offering to pay only N5 million per year, a figure that fell far short of Sophia’s expectations.
His words:
“Sophia allowed David access to their daughter, provided she has her nanny around 24/7. The 9-year-old herself made this request, and I believe this should be favourably considered and accepted. My grand-niece had been released to go out with her cousins on several occasions.”
Discussion about this post