- In the case marked Mr. Lucky Shaibu v. Julius Abure & 5 ORS (Appeal No: CA/B/93/2023), the appellate court affirmed Abure as the national chairman of the party.
- The lordships in a unanimous decision dismissed the appeal of the Appellant
The Court of Appeal sitting in Benin City has struck out a suit challenging the legitimacy of Comrade Julius Abure as the National Chairman of Labour Party.
In the case marked Mr. Lucky Shaibu v. Julius Abure & 5 ORS (Appeal No: CA/B/93/2023), the appellate court affirmed Abure as national chairman of the party.
His Lordships Justice Theresa Ngolika Orji Abadua JCA, Fatima Omoro Akinbami JCA and Hon. Justice Sybil O. Nwaka-Gbagi JCA in a unanimous decision dismissed the appeal of the Appellant.
It will be recalled that one Lucky Shauibu who claimed to be a member of Labour Party in Ward 3 Executive in Esan North East of Edo State suspended the chairman of Labour Party.
In his lead judgment Justice Theresa Ngolika Orji Abadua JCA, upheld the decision of the High Court of Edo State and held that one man cannot unilaterally suspend the national chairman of Labour Party in line with Article 13 and 17 of the Constitution of the Party and the extant Electoral Act of 2022 particularly when the appellant has been described by the party as unknown.
The court unanimously nullified the earlier suspension and all actions taken against Com. Julius Abure and the party arising from the purported suspension.
In a swift reaction to the judgment, Comrade Julius Abure eulogized the judgment and team of justices who refused to close their eyes to the justice of the case. He also thanked the team of selfless lawyers led by GC Igbokwe, SAN.
Com. Julius Abure added “I thank the Obidient movement who tarry with me while the impostor lasted”. GC Igbokwe, SAN the counsel to Com. Julius Abure applauded the judgment and reinstated that Com. Julius Abure, Esq remains the national chairman of Labour Party until the party convention holds. President Aigbokhan, Esq lead counsel to Labour Party said the decision of the Court of Appeal has given a rest to the battle for the soul of the party. According to him, “it is a landmark judgement that will stand the test of time. Anybody still associating with impostors parading as factional leaders of the party does so at their own peril. Political parties must remain watchdog of national conscience.”