Ndume Refutes Anti-Southern Allegations: “My Daughters Married Yoruba”

• Senator Ndume clarifies opposition to CBN’s relocation, citing practical concerns and economic priorities, refuting claims of anti-Yoruba sentiment
• He challenges critics to prove nationalist credentials, highlighting family ties to Yoruba culture and defending daughter’s merit-based employment at CBN

Senator Mohammed Ali Ndume, Chief Whip of the Senate, has dismissed claims suggesting his opposition to the Central Bank of Nigeria’s (CBN) plan to relocate some departments from Abuja to Lagos stems from hatred towards the Yoruba people.

In an interview with reporters, Ndume clarified that his objection was grounded in practical concerns and the perceived insignificance of the CBN’s decision.

Highlighting the need for the CBN governor to prioritize addressing the country’s economic challenges, particularly concerning exchange rates and inflation, Ndume emphasized his lack of bias against the South.

Responding to criticisms alleging his anti-Yoruba sentiment, Ndume challenged his detractors to demonstrate their nationalistic credentials. He pointed out that his family connections belie any such prejudice, citing the marriages of his daughters to Yoruba men and his grandchildren of Yoruba descent.

Dismissing accusations of nepotism regarding his daughter’s employment at the CBN, Ndume asserted her qualifications and reiterated her right to work in any government agency based on merit.

Addressing the media backlash following his stance on the CBN relocation, Ndume maintained his commitment to constructive criticism to support President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s agenda for success.

Asserting his loyalty to Tinubu and underscoring the importance of candid feedback, Ndume criticized what he described as the emergence of a political cartel around the president.

He pledged to continue fulfilling his duties as a senator by speaking truthfully and advocating for necessary reforms without personal bias.

Ndume’s rebuttal underscores the importance of objective discourse and accountability in governance, emphasizing the need for constructive engagement over personal attacks.